Stop regarding man
in whose nostrils is breath,
for of what account is he?
So I read Matthew Henry’s Commentary on this section. I haven’t let it (the passage itself) ruminate too much but I wanted some sound explanation from someone else. Just to see what he might exposit from it. It is solid. It was refreshing.
This passage is summing up a lot of everything. I do not wish to take the light off of the MOST HIGH, but I do want to point out that I am striving to stop regarding man and if that is the case, what other alternative is there? It must be to place all my bets on the Lamb that was slain, but yet that rose to conquer not only the grave, but to unseat the authority that had set itself up. [I pray that I may not fall into lofty speech that is beyond understanding.]
to be continued. Have to run again. [Now where was I..]
